Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2003 20:59:04 -0500 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: 'cygpath -ml ' bug? Message-ID: <20030320015904.GI32580@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <5 DOT 2 DOT 0 DOT 9 DOT 0 DOT 20030319184305 DOT 09c2eea8 AT rogue DOT codemeta DOT com> <5 DOT 2 DOT 0 DOT 9 DOT 2 DOT 20030319173807 DOT 02ba6d80 AT pop3 DOT cris DOT com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5.2.0.9.2.20030319173807.02ba6d80@pop3.cris.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i On Wed, Mar 19, 2003 at 05:42:07PM -0800, Randall R Schulz wrote: >Lee, > >Perhaps. In particular, if one uses Windows mode (instead of mixed >mode) you get the result I think you were expecting (except, of course, >for the orientation of the name separators). Well, since POSIX doesn't have anything like "long file names" I think you could say this isn't really a bug. The -l is a no-op in this case. Or one could always submit a patch... cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/