Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2003 20:45:11 -0500
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: [dpaun AT rogers DOT com: [RFC] windres' -I option]
Message-ID: <20030320014511.GG32580@redhat.com>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <20030319202047 DOT GD27723 AT redhat DOT com> <3E7905B6 DOT 8070702 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <3E7905B6.8070702@ece.gatech.edu>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i

On Wed, Mar 19, 2003 at 07:05:10PM -0500, Charles Wilson wrote:
>
>
>Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>Anyone have any problems with this?  I agree that it makes sense to make
>>-I behave consistently.  Are there scripts which would be fatally impacted
>>if we made this switch?
>
>Okay by me, but you'll need to change winsup/w32api/lib/Makefile.in 
>eventually.

I don't see a -I there.  Isn't it just using --include-dir, which
shouldn't be changing if I read the patch correctly?

cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/