Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2003 21:01:23 -0500 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: cygwin gcc 3.4 and cygwin Message-ID: <20030317020123.GA1109@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <20030317015922 DOT 15816 DOT qmail AT web21401 DOT mail DOT yahoo DOT com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030317015922.15816.qmail@web21401.mail.yahoo.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i On Mon, Mar 17, 2003 at 12:59:21PM +1100, Danny Smith wrote: >Brian Ford wrote: > >> Vanilla gcc 3.2.x is NOT ABI compatible with Cygwin's pre 3.2 gcc, fact. >> I wanted to know why this was allowed to persist given the simple patch >> required to fix it, question. I had seen Mr. Faylor make statements >> before to the effect of: doubles in structures are not that common so who >> cares, so I advised caution in his use of that compiler for official >> Cygwin released software. > >Regarding the structure alignment problem: > >Adding -malign-double to compile switches should provide forward/backward/MSVC >compatibility. > >The other fix is to rebuild gcc from sources so that -malign-double is >the default (as it is now on trunk for cygwin). So did I get this backwards then? Current cygwin gcc has it wrong, trunk has it right? cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/