Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com From: Shankar Unni Subject: Re: Weird stuff in /proc/cpuinfo Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2003 11:33:33 -0800 Lines: 27 Message-ID: References: <20030313224647 DOT GU27047 AT cygbert DOT vinschen DOT de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet AT main DOT gmane DOT org User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.3) Gecko/20030312 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en In-Reply-To: <20030313224647.GU27047@cygbert.vinschen.de> Corinna Vinschen wrote: > Should be fixed in CVS now. And another thing I just noticed: on my PIII-733 laptop (a Mobile PIII), /proc/cpuinfo says: processor : 0 .... model name : Intel(R) Pentium(R) III Mobile CPU 1133MHz ... cpu MHz : 731 Where does it get this 1133 from, I wonder. There's this other nice tool (Aida32) that also gets this wrong in the CPU info panel: it claims: CPU Properties CPU Type Mobile Intel Pentium III-S, 733 MHz (5.5 x 133) CPU Alias Tualatin, A80530 Original Clock 1133 MHz L1 Code Cache 16 KB L1 Data Cache 16 KB L2 Cache 512 KB (On-Die, ATC, Full-Speed) Is this bad info coming from the BIOS, or something that both tools are miscalculating? -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/