Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2003 14:05:04 -0500 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: cygwin-1.3.21-1 Message-ID: <20030313190504.GB1808@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <20030312173132 DOT C16261C221 AT redhat DOT com> <20030313075151 DOT GC26766 AT redhat DOT com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i On Thu, Mar 13, 2003 at 12:16:27PM -0500, Rolf Campbell wrote: >>Yeah, and isn't it a *shame* that when I suggest that people should try >>a snapshot, they never do? The only way I have to test new features is >>to release a new version of cygwin, apparently. And, then listen to the >>complaints. >That was a bug-report, not a complaint. And I generally do try >snapshots, but I missed it just this once (so of course it would affect me). Ok. Fair enough. I thought you were one of those rare people who was actually trying snapshots. So, I wasn't sure how this could have happened. I understand that things slip by. Since I'm not an emacs user this slipped by me. >>I'm looking forward to seeing someone debug what the problem is here. >Me too. Just to be clear: I don't know emacs. I'm not refusing to work on the problem. I don't know how to duplicate it and I don't have the time to track it down now if I did. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/