Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2003 10:53:16 -0500 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: cygwin gcc 3.4 and cygwin Message-ID: <20030312155316.GA14973@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <004801c2e87b$e7bba110$a400a8c0 AT bluebox> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <004801c2e87b$e7bba110$a400a8c0@bluebox> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i On Wed, Mar 12, 2003 at 08:43:55PM +1100, Eugene Rosenzweig wrote: >The latest message in gcc-announce >http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-announce/2003/msg00001.html says that >i?86-*-win32 target will be deprecated as from gcc 3.4 (no date set). If you look in the gcc list where this was discussed you'll see that *I* requested the deprecation. As the cygwin project leader that should give you some relief. As others have noted, the cygwin target is i?86-*-cygwin and that's still available for gcc. Cygwin is safe. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/