Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.0.20030311091641.00ab8968@enotrac.com>
X-Sender: jm AT enotrac DOT com
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2003 09:25:39 +0000
To: <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
From: James Moreland <james DOT moreland AT enotrac DOT com>
Subject: RE: cygwin archive? (previous versions for fallback
In-Reply-To: <000001c2e794$74c419e0$6e02a8c0@testmaschine>
References: <000901c2e629$0602f560$78d96f83 AT pomello>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; format=flowed
X-Loop-Detect: 1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id h2B9Pob02245

At 06:07 2003/03/11, günter strubinsky wrote:
>I can't access the site by typing the URI
>(ftp://ftp.ccp14.ac.uk/ccp14/ftp-mirror/programming/cygwin/pub/cygwin/releas
>e) into the installer. It timed out. I downloaded the whole tree.
>
>That won't install either. The installer throws a fit (aka. an address
>exception) after showing strange chars in the install tree root and only a
>few leaves.
>
>Okay, so I installed the latest and greatest complete cygwin WITHOUT
>Postgres, installed the ipc-daemon (I can't get the one I had, so it's 1.13.
>I installed, got the usual (at least on my machine) mode 0000 for all
>binaries (?). Chmod'ed them to 2777 (I know that's unsecure).
>--install-as-service'd the ipc-daemon and verified that it ran.
>
>Started the installer from the cygwin site and thanks to the advise from
>Christopher (PolleyChristopherW AT JohnDeere DOT com , thank you very much!)
>installed from the copy of the tree ftp'ed from the site the Postgres (V
>7.1.3).
>
>When I pg_start'ed Postgres it took 99% cpu; the usual sign that it does not
>find the ipc-daemon. I verified that the daemon ran. (It did). Chris send me
>a copy of 7.2.3 (identical to the version I had before). I installed from
>this version after completely uninstalling and physically removing the
>cygwin directory tree:
>         Same result.
>
>Lastly I reinstalled with the latest version of postgres and voila, it ran
>like a pink rabbit. Uninstalling Postgres and installing any of the two
>prior versions resultet in 99% cpu from Postgres.
>
>My conclusion is that the ipc-daemon is the culprit and not backwards
>compatible to Postgres < 7.3, which does not make a whole lot of sense.
>
>There is NO version 1.10 of cygipc aka. ipc-daemon on
>http://www.neuro.gatech.edu/users/cwilson/cygutils/cygipc/ available for
>download.
>
>Does anybody out there have either V1.10 of cygipc or a glue what is going
>so wrong with my install?

I don't think that is your problem as I successfully ran postgres 7.2.3 
with cygipc 1.13 for several weeks before inadvertently upgrading to 7.3.2 
like Gunter.

Jim Moreland



--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/