Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID: <003301c2e629$daa29190$78d96f83@pomello>
From: "Max Bowsher" <maxb AT ukf DOT net>
To: "Cygwin \(Robert Collins\)" <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>, <cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com>
References: <Pine DOT GSO DOT 4 DOT 44 DOT 0303090109320 DOT 11568-100000 AT slinky DOT cs DOT nyu DOT edu> <004d01c2e609$ca7a9300$0400a8c0 AT robertcollins DOT net>
Subject: Re: Pending setup patches (Re: [PATCH] Re: Removing concat.cc/h)
Date: Sun, 9 Mar 2003 10:51:35 -0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106

Cygwin (Robert Collins) wrote:
> ===
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Igor Pechtchanski" <pechtcha AT cs DOT nyu DOT edu>
>
>
>>> I still suspect we need a <= rather than == - but we'll see :}.
>>>
>>> Rob
>>
>> Only if "files" is traversed in order of decreasing minlevel.
>> Otherwise we'd have to traverse the whole set before we can find the
>> right log file. Either way, a simple "<=" won't do it, IMO...
>
> Yes but :].
>
> My point is that given the following:
> a level 1 and a level 2 log file, should logfile name(3) fail, or find
> 1/2 ?

I would have thought fail. I can see an argument for wanting logfile(2) to
find a level 3 log file if no level 2 exists, though.

Max.


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/