Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Message-ID: <00d601c2e5d9$a9c7e930$78d96f83@pomello> From: "Max Bowsher" To: "Cygwin \(Robert Collins\)" , Subject: Re: Removing concat.cc/h Date: Sun, 9 Mar 2003 01:17:33 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Max Bowsher wrote: > Cygwin (Robert Collins) wrote: >> === >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Max Bowsher" >> >> >>> What is policy for setup? Should we regenerate Makefile.in (and >>> aclocal.m4, and any other relevent files) with the current Cygwin >>> release of automake, since we are changing it at all, or would you >>> prefer to keep it at the version currently used? >> >> The policy is: >> Whatever version a maintainer has when committing is what goes into >> CVS. Patches must be sent without such cruft to be applied. >> >> This obviously gets easier if we remove said files from CVS. > > Then lets wait until the week you allocated for objections to the > above removal is up, before worrying further about this. > > Do you approve the removal of concat.* once the generated files have > been removed? Cygwin (Robert Collins) wrote: >> * Remove concat.* >> In http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-02/msg00022.html > > Applied. Note to self... read all incoming mail before replying to any! :-) Max. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/