Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From: Charles Wilson <cwilson AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu>
Subject: Re: rpm-4.1 successful compile on Cygwin
Date: Fri, 07 Mar 2003 15:14:09 -0500
Lines: 31
Message-ID: <3E68FD91.7030608@ece.gatech.edu>
References: <00be01c2e4c1$61dd9d90$78d96f83 AT pomello> <3E68E998 DOT 1080303 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <01c701c2e4dc$34af31b0$78d96f83 AT pomello> <3E68F169 DOT 9020905 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <027a01c2e4e2$d7644610$78d96f83 AT pomello>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Complaints-To: usenet AT main DOT gmane DOT org
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.0.1) Gecko/20020823 Netscape/7.0
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en

Max Bowsher wrote:

> I'm not quite sure rpm really is desirable for the Cygwin dist, unless it
> was decided to transition to rpm packages exclusively once setup was
> suitably adapted.

Well, there are grand designs eventually to generalize setup so that it 
can accept tar.bz2 (or .cyg?) packages, as well as linking to (a windows 
native version of...) librpm and libdeb to provide rpm and deb support. 
  There are, of course, MAJOR difficulties with this, which have yet to 
be addressed (like keeping the setup installed.db, rpm's db, and deb's 
"db" all in sync.  Bringing setup's native dependency-resolution logic 
up to the level provided by deb and to a lesser extent rpm. 
Commandline/scripting support. etc etc)

But, rpm has been around for years on cygwin without the sky falling.  I 
  used it back when I provided perl-for-cygwin, as a means of keeping 
track of binary dists of perl modules.  I'm sure there are other, 
similiarly limited uses that won't cause armageddon.

Besides, dpkg is available as an approved cygwin package, and it hasn't 
caused WWIII. (Of course, it also hasn't prompted the porting of the 
rest of the debian toolset, much to Robert's chagrin).

> It's mainly a toy for me, to learn about rpm, whilst not having to reboot
> into Linux.

fair enough.

--Chuck



--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/