Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID: <001201c2e336$d63f5890$78d96f83@pomello>
From: "Max Bowsher" <maxb AT ukf DOT net>
To: "Martin Wolters" <wol AT codingtechnologies DOT com>, <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
References: <157240-22003335151848272 AT M2W097 DOT mail2web DOT com> <200303051712 DOT 22830 DOT wol AT codingtechnologies DOT com> <007801c2e332$ee841a20$78d96f83 AT pomello> <200303051730 DOT 58213 DOT wol AT codingtechnologies DOT com>
Subject: Re: GCC-3.2 problem: undefined ___gxx_personality_v0
Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2003 16:46:57 -0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106

Martin Wolters wrote:
> On Wednesday 05 March 2003 17:19, Max Bowsher wrote:
>> Martin Wolters wrote:
>>> On Wednesday 05 March 2003 16:18, lhall AT pop DOT ma DOT ultranet DOT com wrote:
>>>> OK.  And that file contains only C code?
>>> 
>>> That's a good question. I thought so and I still think so. However,
>>> I just tried "g++ myCFile.c" and it compiles like a charm!!
>>> 
>>> Well, maybe I can find the code that breaks the gcc-build. And if it
>>> turns out to be a valid c-construct I'll send the requested
>>> informationen. But for now I at least have a "workaround".
>> 
>> foo.C means C++. Could your file extension be uppercase accidentally?
> 
> Now that is interesting and it actually is the cause of all troubles.
> My file is really called "MYCFILE.C". Renaming it (mycfile.c) and
> then using gcc mycfile.c works perfectly.
> 
> I didn't now the upper-case C rule. Is that gcc-specific?

I found this by googling on "C cpp c++ cxx cc":
Compiler            possible endings 
GNU compiler g++    C  cc  cpp  cxx  c++
Watcom C++          -- cc  cpp  cxx  c++
Borland C++         -- cc  cpp  cxx  c++
SGI compiler CC     C  cc  cpp  cxx  c++
DEC compiler cxx    C  cc  cpp  cxx  --

Max.


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/