Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Message-Id: <5.2.0.9.2.20030305082205.01de2ae8@pop3.cris.com> X-Sender: rrschulz AT pop3 DOT cris DOT com Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2003 08:24:27 -0800 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com From: Randall R Schulz Subject: Re: COM In-Reply-To: <3E65DBE8.16563.76B2555D@localhost> References: <5575473D4532D411BE4C009027E8C8380AB81562 AT masblrexc02 DOT mascotsystems DOT com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Robert, At 08:13 2003-03-05, Robert Praetorius wrote: > > Hi Gang > > How do I link my COM pgms? > > For half a second I was ready to fling > > http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html. Fling away! Is it COM, Component Object Model (with it's cousin DCOM, Distributed COM) or is it COM as in COM1:, COM2:, etc.? >at you - then I realized that grepping the web (or even the cygwin.com >corner of it) for COM is a nontrivial proposition. > > I don't know from COM, but this message > > http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2000-05/msg00257.html > >indicates that, even in antiquity, a program (Perl, in this case) compiled >under Cygwin with gcc was able to use COM. The bread crumbs led me here: > > http://cygwin.com/faq/faq_4.html#SEC95 > >where I see ole32 in the list (as I said, I don't know from COM, but a >brief surf and a test compile led me to believe that ole32.dll contains at >least some of the COM-related functions you need. I bet you can find any >others that COM requires.). This assumes that the OP was asking about Component Object Model, but I don't see how that can be assumed, given how little he said. Randall Schulz -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/