Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2003 10:37:10 -0500 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Is this OK with the GPL? Message-ID: <20030305153710.GA24575@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <20030305035035 DOT GA2524 AT redhat DOT com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i On Wed, Mar 05, 2003 at 08:36:30AM +0000, John Morrison wrote: >On Tue, 4 Mar 2003, Christopher Faylor wrote: >> On Tue, Mar 04, 2003 at 08:48:02PM -0000, John Morrison wrote: >> > >> > >> > >> > >> >New Windows Installers >> > * Safely install Cygwin with its environment automatically >> > configured for Windows OS machines. >> > * The Uninstaller features cleanup of registry settings and >> > environment variables. >> > * All toolsuites are consistent (Stout?s Law) in how you install them. >> > >> > >> >With all the comments wrt GPL and licensing... >> >> Am I correct in assuming that you'd have to buy the product to find out? >> They are under no obligation to give anything away, but if they provide >> binaries, they surely must also provide sources. > >Yeah, you have to buy it. They do a 30 day demo, surely that can't >come with source!? Wonder how GPL deals with that. I think the GPL is pretty clear. If you give someone a binary, you have to give them the source. There is no "out" for a 30 day demo. >(Please note I'm not trying to make trouble, just curious!) I know. Licensing issues are always trouble, though. :-( cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/