Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2003 22:54:01 -0500 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Cc: h DOT m DOT brand AT hccnet DOT nl Subject: Re: cygwin snap 20030223 hangs with bleadperl Message-ID: <20030305035401.GB2524@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com, h DOT m DOT brand AT hccnet DOT nl References: <20030304095413 DOT 1E4B DOT H DOT M DOT BRAND AT hccnet DOT nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i On Tue, Mar 04, 2003 at 10:23:14AM -0500, Igor Pechtchanski wrote: >On Tue, 4 Mar 2003, H.Merijn Brand wrote: > >> On Tue 04 Mar 2003 06:01, Christopher Faylor wrote: >> > On Wed, Feb 26, 2003 AT 03:20:02PM +0100, H.Merijn Brand wrote: >> > >On Tue 25 Feb 2003 14:15, "H.Merijn Brand" wrote: >> > >> ../ext/IO/lib/IO/t/io_udp..............ok >> > >> ../ext/IO/lib/IO/t/io_unix.............ok 1/5 >> > >> >> > >> 20030220 still OK >> > > >> > >20030225 also hangs >> > > >> > >(Note that I'm still not on the list) >> > >> > Is it better now? >> > >> > cgf >> >> Yep. >> >> CYGWIN_NT-5.0 PC09 1.3.21s(0.77/3/2) 20030302 23:00:55 i686 unknown unknown Cygwin >> >> Completed the smoke. I was discussing a longstanding Cygwin issue yesterday >> with some other smokers and we all agreed that there is still a glitch in >> cygwin that /we/ think cygwin is to blame for. >> >> Running the complete test from the prompt completes without error, but when >> started from a script in the background, there are still messages that get a >> added and unexpectedly yield instead of plain , causing >> these tests to fail: Expected Foo, got Foo >> >> $CYGWIN is "tty ntsec binary" > ^^^^^^ >Umm, there is no such setting in the CYGWIN environment variable. Perhaps >you meant to say "binmode"? > Shouldn't matter binmode is the default. I suspect that there is a non-cygwin application lurking in the mix somewhere? If it's a perl script, then maybe something is explcitly setting binmode(0). cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/