Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Message-ID: <20030304222526.28749.qmail@web80409.mail.yahoo.com> Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2003 14:25:26 -0800 (PST) From: Wuphons Reach Subject: Re: WinXP installation - can't access all of the package on the Select Packages page To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com In-Reply-To: <000d01c2e299$4e6264a0$78d96f83@pomello> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii So, basically, those of us who are encountering a show-stopper bug that prevents us from installing Cygwin (unless we choose to install the full version, which is an interesting task in itself when you can't see that the 3rd radio button is "Expert") have less to complain about then those who will experience a minor cosmetic issue? That strikes me as a very strange prioritization that a purely cosmetic issue would take priority over working around a functional bug (regardless that Microsoft has changed the rules). Am I correct in understanding then that: a) there are no plans to deal with this bug b) those people who are experiencing this bug are thrown to the wolves c) this list is not interested in bugs that can't be fixed in an elegant manner --- Max Bowsher wrote: > > And then they will try to resize it. > And then they will be annoyed that it doesn't work. > And then they will complain. > > Max. > __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now. http://mailplus.yahoo.com -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/