Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2003 11:15:15 +0100 From: Marcel Telka To: Kasper Nielsen Cc: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Cygwin and other open source licenses Message-ID: <20030304101515.GE1036@aragorn> References: <3E646E17 DOT 7090802 AT kav DOT dk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <3E646E17.7090802@kav.dk>; from news@kav.dk on Ut, mar 04, 2003 at 10:12:55 +0100 Lines: 27 > Hi, > > I was just browsing Slashdot and came across this interview with > Professor Eben Moglen. (see below) > I'm currently doing a project at my university that uses the > cygwin.dll > for windows compatibility. > My project is licensed under some special open source university > license > like most universities has. > However after having read the interview it seems to me that I'm > violating the license by not using the GPL for my work but some other > open source license with my university requires. > Am I right? If you want to distribute your software in source code form only and sources for cygwin1.dll are not a part of the distribution, then you are free to chose any license you want (including proprietary) for your software. -- +-------------------------------------------+ | Marcel Telka e-mail: marcel AT telka DOT sk | | homepage: http://telka.sk/ | | jabber: marcel AT jabber DOT sk | +-------------------------------------------+ -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/