Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com X-Authentication-Warning: localhost.localdomain: ronald owned process doing -bs Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2003 10:31:42 +0100 (CET) From: Ronald Landheer-Cieslak X-X-Sender: ronald AT localhost DOT localdomain To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Testsuite as a package (was: Re: Was that the sound of a snapshot going off?) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII On Mon, 3 Mar 2003, Igor Pechtchanski wrote: > On Mon, 3 Mar 2003, Ronald Landheer-Cieslak wrote: > > On Sun, 2 Mar 2003, Christopher Faylor wrote: > > > Please try the latest cygwin snapshot and report any problems or successes > > > here. The latest snapshot may be close to cygwin 1.3.21. > > I would *love* to do that, but I have a WIBGI (Wouldn't It Be Great If > > ...) > > > > WIBGI the testsuite for Cygwin (the one in the winsup subdirectory) would > > be available as a separate package via Setup (under the experimental > > packages, of course) That would make it a lot easier for us folks willing > > to help to .. help! :) > > > > Any time you launch a "Please try the snapshot - it might become the next > > version" I would be more than willing to run the testsuite against the > > snapshot and report any regressions (and investigate them if need be). > > > > My problem is that I don't have (and can't get) a copyright assignment, so > > I am restricted to trivial contributions - which is why I haven't made any > > so far. > > > > To limit trafic to the mailing list, if you like this idea, I would > > propose to add a list called cygwin-regressions at cygwin dot com for the > > output of the testsuite - so this list doesn't get flooded with reports. > > > > Good idea? Bad idea? > > rlc > > Ronald, > > A few points (in original message order): > 2) The absense of copyright assignment does not prevent you from checking > out the winsup/tests directory (or, in fact, any cygwin cvs repository) > anonymously (). There is no need for a > separate package... There is no *need* for a separate package - but it would make life easier for those who want to help regression testing. > 3) I believe (and please correct me if I'm wrong) that the testsuite is > run after most commits, and regressions are noticed right away, so your > proposal would be kind of redundant. Besides, the testsuite doesn't > catch everything, and most reports on the list were not related to the > testsuite, but to real world applications. The testsuite can't possibly be run after every commit on all target platforms. Red Hat may have a lot of resources, but I don't believe for a moment that it they can run the testsuite on a couple of thousand machines after every commit. I never said it was a necessity - or even implied it. I said "wouldn't it be great if" (or WIBGI for short). I think it would be a good idea to have a separate testsuite that I can just install & run whenever a new snapshot gets launched. I think it will be of help to signal regressions and I want to be of help if I can. I *know* not having a license disclaimer does not deprive me of CVS access - I also know that I don't want to have to compile Cygwin every time I want to run the test suite - and the test suite as is just happens to depend on new-cygwin1.dll (to test a just-compiled Cygwin DLL). > Mean enough? ;-) I ain't crying yet, so no ;) rlc -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/