Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2003 11:07:55 -0500
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: cygwin as an acronym? (Was Re: Official List of cygwin Acronyms)
Message-ID: <20030303160755.GA21446@redhat.com>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <20030303152151 DOT GB29464 AT redhat DOT com> <Pine DOT LNX DOT 4 DOT 44 DOT 0303031637580 DOT 919-100000 AT localhost DOT localdomain>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0303031637580.919-100000@localhost.localdomain>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i

On Mon, Mar 03, 2003 at 04:40:03PM +0100, Ronald Landheer-Cieslak wrote:
>On Mon, 3 Mar 2003, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 03, 2003 at 11:27:24AM +0100, Ronald Landheer-Cieslak wrote:
>> >How about a recursive acronym: "Cygwin: your greatest winner in 
>> >necessities"
>> >;)
>> It's not mean enough.  Can't you get with it ninnies????
>That would be the acronym for the mailing list: Can't You Get With It 
>Ninnies at Cygwin (your greatest winner in necessities) dot Com[e] On 
>Man!
>
>(You see the two recursions ? ;)

"To understand recursion, you must first understand recursion"

cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/