Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2003 10:25:53 -0500
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Cc: sebastien DOT poncet AT nc-2 DOT fr
Subject: Re: GPL Violation
Message-ID: <20030303152553.GD29464@redhat.com>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com, sebastien DOT poncet AT nc-2 DOT fr
References: <CE06EB9079A27349B9CBEFFEBE93F741022B6F AT mxltds07 DOT ncf DOT local>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CE06EB9079A27349B9CBEFFEBE93F741022B6F@mxltds07.ncf.local>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i

On Mon, Mar 03, 2003 at 02:54:15PM +0100, Poncet S?bastien wrote:
>Concerning http://spt.free.fr/fetchmail/ ...
>
>Allthought I understand what you mean, I got first very angry.  I will
>modify my page very soon and will only provide the modified sources.
>Thanks for explanations.

Yeah, think how I feel having to explain this over and over again and
having people assume that the person responsible for the project (working
for a company who bases all of their offerings on GPLed products) is such
an idiot that he doesn't understand how his product is licensed.

Yeah, I sure do love these licensing discussions.  They really make my
day.

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/