Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Message-ID: <004701c2e0e4$fa966200$78d96f83@pomello> From: "Max Bowsher" To: References: <001b01c2e0d1$2393a320$78d96f83 AT pomello> <20030302173304 DOT GC441 AT redhat DOT com> <20030302174328 DOT GD441 AT redhat DOT com> Subject: Re: Processes are unable to fully discard their controlling terminal Date: Sun, 2 Mar 2003 17:55:57 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Sun, Mar 02, 2003 at 12:33:04PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote: >> On Sun, Mar 02, 2003 at 03:33:56PM -0000, Max Bowsher wrote: >>> Processes that attempt to shed their controlling terminal do so >>> well enough for the tty to show as ? in ps output, but they still >>> keep the console window they were launched from open, after all >>> other processes using it have exited. >>> >>> This is particularly annoying with ssh-agent - if I exit the shell >>> in the terminal that launched it, that terminal becomes a zombie, >>> hanging around for no purpose. If I close that window using the >>> Windows close box, the ssh-agent is killed. >>> >>> I'm not an expert in the ways of Unix ttys. Can anyone help me >>> understand where the problem lies? >> >> setsid() > > I think I see the problem. It will be tricky to fix but I'll see > what I can do. Wow! Thanks! You realize, you can no longer claim to be mean.... :-) Max. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/