Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Message-ID: <003701c2dfac$11ebcbf0$0200000a@agamemnon> From: "Jon A. Lambert" To: "Cygwin" References: <20030220132911 DOT GF1744 AT tishler DOT net> <1046476903 DOT 3e5ff8678775c AT imp DOT free DOT fr> <20030301002605 DOT GC1244 AT tishler DOT net> Subject: Re: GPL Violation Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2003 23:36:04 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 If you provide download links to where one can download the software does that not satisfy the following license provision? "If distribution of executable or object code is made by offering access to copy from a designated place, then offering equivalent access to copy the source code from the same place counts as distribution of the source code, even though third parties are not compelled to copy the source along with the object code." If not what then does the above provision mean? Or more specifically just what does "place" mean? The visible place or space such as web page that offers links to source and binaries side by side, or some physical constraint that they both must reside on the same domain, same machine or *gasp* even same hard drive. Is it not the spirit of license of the license to offer the source up and not hide it? Or is it to demand some sort of fixed network topology? ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jason Tishler" To: Cc: "Cygwin" Sent: Friday, February 28, 2003 7:26 PM Subject: Re: GPL Violation > On Sat, Mar 01, 2003 at 01:01:43AM +0100, spt AT free DOT fr wrote: > > Responding to Jason Tishler : > > I'm sorry but I guess you did not read carefully what was written on > > my page http://spt.free.fr/fetchmail/. > > I did. > > > In fact, I don't provide cygwin*.dll, this is actually RedHat's > > property. > > Then what is the following? > > http://spt.free.fr/fetchmail/cygwin1.dll > > > What I did is modify fetchmail's sources as downloadable on my page (see > > fetchmail-5.9.6.hacked_for_cygwin.tar.gz). > > And what about the following? > > http://spt.free.fr/fetchmail/fetchmail-5.9.6-win32-setup-v1.0.1.exe > > which contains: > > $ zipinfo fetchmail-5.9.6-win32-setup-v1.0.1.exe > Archive: fetchmail-5.9.6-win32-setup-v1.0.1.exe 795256 bytes 12 files > -rw-a-- 2.2 ntf 7203 b- stor 4-Feb-02 17:05 fienu.hl_ > *> -rw-a-- 2.2 ntf 322188 b- defX 13-Sep-01 05:03 cygwin1.dl_ > -rw-a-- 2.2 ntf 306 b- stor 7-Feb-02 10:13 fetchmail.cf_ > -rw-a-- 2.2 ntf 180155 b- defX 4-Feb-02 10:23 fetchmail.ex_ > -rw-a-- 2.2 ntf 17663 b- stor 4-Feb-02 17:05 fienu.dl_ > -rw-a-- 2.2 ntf 10366 b- stor 20-Jun-01 18:14 cygintl.dl_ > -rw-a-- 2.2 ntf 17883 b- stor 4-Feb-02 17:09 fifra.dl_ > -rw-a-- 2.2 ntf 7731 b- stor 4-Feb-02 17:09 fifra.hl_ > -rw-a-- 2.2 ntf 16343 b- stor 31-Aug-96 00:02 instsrv.ex_ > -rw-a-- 2.2 ntf 3838 b- stor 16-Jul-97 01:16 movexe.ex_ > -rwxa-- 2.2 ntf 207589 b- defX 4-Mar-02 14:52 setup.exe > **> -rw-a-- 2.2 ntf 3914 b- stor 31-Aug-96 00:11 srvany.ex_ > 12 files, 795179 bytes uncompressed, 761766 bytes compressed: 4.2% > > BTW, redistributing srvany.exe violates MS's SDK licensing. > > > So please, don't tell me I'm violating GPL Licenses ... :(( > > Sorry, but IMO you are. > > Jason > > -- > PGP/GPG Key: http://www.tishler.net/jason/pubkey.asc or key servers > Fingerprint: 7A73 1405 7F2B E669 C19D 8784 1AFD E4CC ECF4 8EF6 > > -- > Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple > Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html > Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html > FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ > > -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/