Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID: <20030227211152.57597.qmail@web21401.mail.yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2003 13:11:52 -0800 (PST)
From: Rick Rankin <rick_rankin AT yahoo DOT com>
Subject: Re: tetex 2.0.1-1 listed under 'previous' in setup.ini
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Cc: janneke AT gnu DOT org
In-Reply-To: <3.0.6.32.20030227215340.007a0a60@127.0.0.1>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

I was just discussing this with Jan Nieuwenhuizen, and I believe he's going to
take care of it.

--Rick
--- Ton van Overbeek <v-overbeek AT cistron DOT nl> wrote:
> I noticed when tetex and lilypond were released yesterday, that only 
> lilypond showed up in setup.exe. Checking the downloaded setup.ini made
> clear why:
> tetex 20020911-1 is still listed as the current version,
> while tetex 2.0.1-1 is now listed as the previous version.
> Probably the automated production of setup.ini got confused by the change
> from a date based version to a 'normal' version.
> Can somebody please correct this ?
> 
> Ton van Overbeek
> 
> 
> --
> Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
> Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
> Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
> FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
> 


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/