Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-Id: <3.0.6.32.20030227215340.007a0a60@127.0.0.1>
X-Sender: ton AT 127 DOT 0 DOT 0 DOT 1 (Unverified)
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2003 21:53:40 +0100
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From: Ton van Overbeek <v-overbeek AT cistron DOT nl>
Subject: tetex 2.0.1-1 listed under 'previous' in setup.ini
Cc: janneke AT gnu DOT org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

I noticed when tetex and lilypond were released yesterday, that only 
lilypond showed up in setup.exe. Checking the downloaded setup.ini made
clear why:
tetex 20020911-1 is still listed as the current version,
while tetex 2.0.1-1 is now listed as the previous version.
Probably the automated production of setup.ini got confused by the change
from a date based version to a 'normal' version.
Can somebody please correct this ?

Ton van Overbeek


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/