Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Message-ID: <006d01c2ddb2$44425430$78d96f83@pomello> From: "Max Bowsher" To: , "Thorsten Kampe" References: <20030224223818 DOT GO14960 AT pentek DOT com> <166csci6pzgip DOT dlg AT thorstenkampe DOT de> <002501c2dc5f$90131a10$78d96f83 AT pomello> <1fayt2te3v7q6 DOT dlg AT thorstenkampe DOT de> <009501c2dc64$76e4c660$78d96f83 AT pomello> <016601c2dd0a$5dc57bb0$78d96f83 AT pomello> <6b1kvpz70dlb DOT dlg AT thorstenkampe DOT de> <20030226033529 DOT GA28291 AT redhat DOT com> Subject: Re: Minimum Install for Executable Distrubution Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2003 16:15:23 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Thorsten Kampe wrote: > I don't know these reasons for all those Base packages. But the > reasons are in my opinion not trivial. Omitting tar for example hasn't > simply the effect "so you cannot use tar" but "so you cannot install > via setup.exe, because the installation packages are tarred (and > bzipped)"[1] > > [1] This is an assumption, because I don't think setup.exe has builtin > "tar.bz2" support You obviously weren't thinking when you wrote this. Of *course* setup handles "tar.bz2" files all by itself. How else is it going to do a clean install of Cygwin!!! Max. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/