Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From: Charles Wilson <cwilson AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu>
Subject: Re: Libtool patch - installation of DLLs with ntsec
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2003 23:15:44 -0500
Lines: 16
Message-ID: <3E5AEDF0.3000107@ece.gatech.edu>
References: <00bc01c2d922$41ba0260$78d96f83 AT pomello>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Complaints-To: usenet AT main DOT gmane DOT org
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.2.1) Gecko/20021130
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
In-Reply-To: <00bc01c2d922$41ba0260$78d96f83@pomello>

Max Bowsher wrote:
> I just found this in a forgotten corner of my hard drive.
> 
> The issue it was created to solve was that DLLs are installed without
> execute permission, when ntsec is on. I haven't tested this recently,
> because I decided some time ago that nontsec made my life a whole lot
> easier, but it did work when I wrote it.
> 
> Here it is, in case anyone wants it.

I'll file it away, in case anyone complains in the future.  But AFAIK 
this is no longer a problem -- at least, I use ntsec and I haven't run 
into libtool installing DLLs without execute perms.

--Chuck



--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/