Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com> List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/> List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs> Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2003 16:10:30 -0500 From: Christopher Faylor <cgf-cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: mknod implementation? any idea when it will occur? Message-ID: <20030224211030.GA21002@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <OF740BE822 DOT 6DFA596C-ON88256CD7 DOT 0072DD1B AT hughes DOT com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <OF740BE822.6DFA596C-ON88256CD7.0072DD1B@hughes.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i On Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 12:58:29PM -0800, james DOT m DOT barker AT boeing DOT com wrote: >I am porting some code from a linux / unix environment that views solid >models thru geomview. I have the latest cygwin release installed >1.3.20. My problem is that the mknod function does not exist. Are >there any plans to implement a working version of mknod and not just >the dummy version that tells me it's not implemented. Yes. Maybe as soon as 1.3.22. The code already exists on the cgf-dev-branch in CVS but it is still being tweaked. I don't have a more specific timeframe than that. cgf -- Please use the resources at cygwin.com rather than sending personal email. Special for spam email harvesters: send email to aaaspam AT sourceware DOT org and be permanently blocked from mailing lists at sources.redhat.com -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/