Message-Id: <200302220548.h1M5mRx12020@delorie.com>
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Newsgroups: gmane.os.cygwin
Subject: RE: Seg fault in home-built mutt
From: news AT garydjones DOT mailshell DOT com
References: <20030219073021 DOT MFEL2030 DOT mtiwgwc16 DOT worldnet DOT att DOT net AT mtiwgwc16 DOT worldnet DOT att DOT net> <NCBBIHCHBLCMLBLOBONKOEEJDNAA DOT g DOT r DOT vansickle AT worldnet DOT att DOT net>
User-Agent: Xnews/4.11.09
X-No-Archive: yes
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Gate: Hamster/1.3.23.185 NewsToMail-Gate
Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2003 21:15:20 +0100

On 21 Feb 2003, "Gary R. Van Sickle"
<g DOT r DOT vansickle AT worldnet DOT att DOT net> wrote: 

>> I managed to get mutt built at the weekend such that
>> the dotlock stuff was external.
> [snip]
>> Everything seemed to be fine until I got an email
>> with some attachments, which caused a segmentation
>> fault.
[snip]
> I haven't built mutt... uhm... well... since I released -1
> :-(.  Lemme try it here quick...
[snip]
> ...OK, it died.  I'm getting:
>
>   regex.o(.text+0x191f):regex.c: undefined reference to
>   `_btowc' 
>
> Don't know what that's all about.

Great. That's what I get too (+ _wctype and _iswctype), so at 
least I know it is not something peculiar to my setup. I guess 
there's some lib missing somewhere, but I don't know how you 
built it before if that is so. I don't have time right this 
minute to look at it either.

 What
>> are the exact ./configure options that you use, please?
>>
>
> I use the following in my "makemutt" build script, which I
> thought I included in the src package:

You did. I am stupid. Or blind. Or both. (No, this is not a CFV 
:-) Sorry, Gary. I think I didn't see it because I thought that 
that directory was, well, what it said, patches to make the 
thing build on Cygwin, which should be applied against the 
official source. Funnily enough I was going to suggest that each 
src package have a script included which built the package as 
done by the maintainer, but I see I am too late.

I'm going to have a bash about with this over the next week and 
will let you know what I find out, if anything. Thanks for your 
time Gary, you too Justin.

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/