Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2003 18:10:32 -0500 Message-Id: <200302202310.h1KNAWh16962@greed.delorie.com> From: DJ Delorie To: cgf AT redhat DOT com CC: rwcitek AT alum DOT calberkeley DOT org, cygwin AT cygwin DOT com In-reply-to: <20030220230040.GA21982@redhat.com> (message from Christopher Faylor on Thu, 20 Feb 2003 18:00:40 -0500) Subject: Re: [rwcitek AT alum DOT calberkeley DOT org: Re: GPL Violation] References: <20030220230040 DOT GA21982 AT redhat DOT com> Some comments: > If they want the source from the LUG, they should contact us about > prices. This is acceptable, but GPL 3b requires that you provide a *written* promise to that effect. IMHO it only needs to be sufficiently legal to be a binding contract - i.e. dated and authenticatable. How you acheive that is up your lawyer ;-) And (this is the fun part) it needs to be effective for three years, so keep a copy of that source cd, as you must ship the exact corresponding sources, not some random newer version. > We therefore charge a hefty price to deliver the source in CD form. "Charge" is OK, "hefty" is not. > This not only covers our time and production costs, The GPL allows this. > but also encourages the members to go to the primary repository > (cygwin.com) for the sources. The GPL forbids this. It allows *actual* costs, but no more. But be fair to yourself - figure out media costs, hours spent, shipping, overhead, etc. The GPL doesn't want you to suffer from this, but neither can the recipient suffer. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/