Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2003 10:30:11 +0100 From: Corinna Vinschen To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: stat/fstat incompatibility w/ unix sockets Message-ID: <20030220093011.GA1403@cygbert.vinschen.de> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <3E543740 DOT 15115 DOT 880198B AT localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3E543740.15115.880198B@localhost> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i On Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 02:02:40AM -0500, Paul Swartz wrote: Content-Description: Mail message body > The man page for stat/fstat says that the results > returned should be the same. However, when asking > for the fstat on a unix socket, the result is not > the same. The attached python code demonstrates > this problem. Is this an already known issue with > a solution already? Are there plans to resolve > it? *What* is the difference? Some details would be helpful. Especially I'm not using python at all. A short test case in C would be appreciated or at least a description of the difference you see. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Developer mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat, Inc. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/