Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2003 20:58:54 -0500 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: [avail for test] libtool-devel-20030121-1 Message-ID: <20030220015854.GC12001@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <3E518ED7 DOT 7020401 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <009b01c2d86b$8ceabed0$c66307d5 AT BRAMSCHE> <3E54354C DOT 5040502 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3E54354C.5040502@ece.gatech.edu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i On Wed, Feb 19, 2003 at 08:54:20PM -0500, Charles Wilson wrote: >>2. This could be fixed by using the new direct-linking-to-dll >>functionality for libraries with many symbols rsp. big import >>libraries, which I hope will be available soon. > >right. What's the holdup there? IIRC, there are two outstanding >patches to binutils with cygwin impact; one of yours, I think, plus >another one from Fabrizio Gennari (as modified by Danny Smith). Last I >heard, we were still waiting on Fabrizio's copyright assignment; it >doesn't appear that the patch has been added. Are we still waiting? >Anybody know what's up with that? AFAIK, we're still waiting on Fabrizio's assignment. I don't recall that there are any other outstanding binutils patches that impact cygwin. Oh wait, yes. There is a windres patch still waiting approval, I think. But that isn't really pertinent to this discussion, I suspect. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/