Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2003 18:39:46 -0500 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Obtaining a pervious version Message-ID: <20030217233946.GB18885@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <3E5024EE DOT 400 AT itee DOT uq DOT edu DOT au> <20030217145707 DOT GA3647 AT redhat DOT com> <3E51599B DOT 5090301 AT itee DOT uq DOT edu DOT au> <001401c2d6d0$6102a4a0$78d96f83 AT pomello> <3E5163E3 DOT 7000605 AT itee DOT uq DOT edu DOT au> <001701c2d6d6$403696e0$78d96f83 AT pomello> <20030217224649 DOT GA18908 AT redhat DOT com> <3E516C10 DOT 8050309 AT itee DOT uq DOT edu DOT au> <003101c2d6da$adc26cd0$78d96f83 AT pomello> <20030217233207 DOT GA18885 AT redhat DOT com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030217233207.GA18885@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i On Mon, Feb 17, 2003 at 06:32:07PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote: >On Mon, Feb 17, 2003 at 11:17:02PM -0000, Max Bowsher wrote: >>John Williams wrote: >>> Christopher Faylor wrote: >>>> On Mon, Feb 17, 2003 at 10:45:20PM -0000, Max Bowsher wrote: >>>> >>>>> Compile your own EDK toolchain against Cygwin itself, not Xygwin. >>>> >>>> >>>> Correct. >>>> >>>> I don't suppose you'd be willing to make the "modified" sources >>>> available, would you? I'm interested in what these people have done >>>> to cygwin. >>> >>> Christopher, >>> >>> Can I please discuss this with you privately? Email to cfg AT redhat DOT com >>> bounced. >> >>Well, yes, it would, you've misspelt his name. But does it need to be >>private? It sounds interesting. > >I've found the sources and am downloading them as I type. > >Thanks, though. Ok. This version just changes the name of the DLL from cygwin1.dll to xygwin1.dll. They didn't even go to the effort of changing the name of the shared memory region. If they had done that you wouldn't be getting the "two versions of cygwin errors". Oh well. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/