Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID: <3E516D04.90805@itee.uq.edu.au>
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2003 09:15:16 +1000
From: John Williams <jwilliams AT itee DOT uq DOT edu DOT au>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:0.9.9) Gecko/20020311
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: Obtaining a pervious version
References: <3E5024EE DOT 400 AT itee DOT uq DOT edu DOT au> <20030217145707 DOT GA3647 AT redhat DOT com> <3E51599B DOT 5090301 AT itee DOT uq DOT edu DOT au> <001401c2d6d0$6102a4a0$78d96f83 AT pomello> <3E5163E3 DOT 7000605 AT itee DOT uq DOT edu DOT au> <001701c2d6d6$403696e0$78d96f83 AT pomello> <20030217224649 DOT GA18908 AT redhat DOT com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Checked: This message probably not SPAM
X-Spam-Score: -1.4
X-Spam-Tests: DATE_IN_PAST_06_12,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES,SPAM_PHRASE_02_03,USER_AGENT,USER_AGENT_MOZILLA_UA,X_ACCEPT_LANG
X-Spam-Report: SPAM: -1.40 hits, 8 required;
	SPAM: * -0.6 -- User-Agent header indicates a non-spam MUA (Mozilla)
	SPAM: * -0.5 -- Has a valid-looking References header
	SPAM: * -0.5 -- Found a User-Agent header
	SPAM: * -0.2 -- Found a X-Accept-Language header
	SPAM: *  0.8 -- BODY: Spam phrases score is 02 to 03 (medium)
	SPAM: * -0.8 -- BODY: Contains what looks like a quoted email text
	SPAM: *  0.4 -- Date: is 6 to 12 hours before Received: date
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.28 (www . roaringpenguin . com / mimedefang)

Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 17, 2003 at 10:45:20PM -0000, Max Bowsher wrote:
> 
>>Compile your own EDK toolchain against Cygwin itself, not Xygwin.
> 
> 
> Correct.
> 
> I don't suppose you'd be willing to make the "modified" sources available,
> would you?  I'm interested in what these people have done to cygwin.

Christopher,

Can I please discuss this with you privately?

Thanks,

John


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/