Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2003 17:46:49 -0500 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Obtaining a pervious version Message-ID: <20030217224649.GA18908@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <3E5024EE DOT 400 AT itee DOT uq DOT edu DOT au> <20030217145707 DOT GA3647 AT redhat DOT com> <3E51599B DOT 5090301 AT itee DOT uq DOT edu DOT au> <001401c2d6d0$6102a4a0$78d96f83 AT pomello> <3E5163E3 DOT 7000605 AT itee DOT uq DOT edu DOT au> <001701c2d6d6$403696e0$78d96f83 AT pomello> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <001701c2d6d6$403696e0$78d96f83@pomello> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i On Mon, Feb 17, 2003 at 10:45:20PM -0000, Max Bowsher wrote: >Compile your own EDK toolchain against Cygwin itself, not Xygwin. Correct. I don't suppose you'd be willing to make the "modified" sources available, would you? I'm interested in what these people have done to cygwin. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/