Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-Id: <5.2.0.9.2.20030217080859.01da50d8@pop3.cris.com>
X-Sender: rrschulz AT pop3 DOT cris DOT com
Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2003 08:15:39 -0800
To: Dalibor Topic <robilad AT yahoo DOT com>, Cygwin Mailing List <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
From: Randall R Schulz <rrschulz AT cris DOT com>
Subject: Re: Is gcc 2 still supported in cygwin at all?
In-Reply-To: <20030217093604.32370.qmail@web10010.mail.yahoo.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed

Dalibor,

At 01:36 2003-02-17, Dalibor Topic wrote:
>I'm just wondering, because I got 0 replies for my bugreport on this 
>mailing list last week.

Install the "gcc2" package.

However, the GCC 3.2.x compiler almost certainly did not introduce 
optimizer bugs as your report suggests. Far more likely is that it 
exposed bugs in the code you're compiling.

Randall Schulz


>cheers,
>dalibor topic


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/