Message-Id: <200302160732.h1G7Www26044@delorie.com>
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Newsgroups: gmane.os.cygwin
Subject: RE: mutt "lock count exceeded"
From: news AT garydjones DOT mailshell DOT com
References: <20030215095551 DOT HLCP9415 DOT mtiwmhc14 DOT worldnet DOT att DOT net AT mtiwmhc14 DOT worldnet DOT att DOT net> <NCBBIHCHBLCMLBLOBONKGENEDMAA DOT g DOT r DOT vansickle AT worldnet DOT att DOT net>
User-Agent: Xnews/4.11.09
X-No-Archive: yes
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Gate: Hamster/1.3.23.185 NewsToMail-Gate
Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2003 22:40:35 +0100

On 15 Feb 2003, "Gary R. Van Sickle"
<g DOT r DOT vansickle AT worldnet DOT att DOT net> wrote: 

>> I noticed the thread here starting at
>> http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/2002-12/msg01010.html.
>> Did the patch in that thread ever get into the Cygwin Mutt
>> package?
[..]
> No, not yet.

OK, thanks.

>  I apologize,

No need to.

> I've been rather negligent in my
> duties of trying to get Jason Tishler to take over mutt
> maintenance ;-). 

That Jason's such a slacker ;-) there's no way he'll take it on.

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/