Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2003 21:07:51 -0500 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: [Problem] mempcpy is missing? (FAQ alert) Message-ID: <20030216020751.GA13451@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <20030215210505 DOT GA29578 AT redhat DOT com> <010601c2d537$decb05c0$78d96f83 AT pomello> <20030215215840 DOT GA3446 AT redhat DOT com> <3E4EC408 DOT 8070500 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <004201c2d546$ba7482a0$78d96f83 AT pomello> <3E4ECC52 DOT 50609 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <20030215234909 DOT GB12171 AT redhat DOT com> <3E4EEE4A DOT 5020302 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3E4EEE4A.5020302@ece.gatech.edu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i On Sat, Feb 15, 2003 at 08:50:02PM -0500, Charles Wilson wrote: >Christopher Faylor wrote: >>Breaking up the headers or adding a OS-specific "capability.h", or >>something similar, which defines __HAVE_CLOCK would probably be the >>best way to deal with this. Assuming that this was a major issue -- >>which I don't think it is. > >You mean, if it ain't broke don't mess with it? > >Where have I heard that before... I think I just made it up. I'm so proud. Who would have thought, two major new concepts in two weeks? First it was the "simple test case" and now this. I'm really on a roll. Heh. Get it "on a roll"? That's a new phrase that I just thought of. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/