Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2003 18:50:01 -0500 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Why the rash of people bypassing setup.exe to install? Message-ID: <20030215235001.GC12171@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <1045263241 DOT 1203 DOT 46 DOT camel AT localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i On Sat, Feb 15, 2003 at 03:41:37PM -0800, Peter A. Castro wrote: >On 15 Feb 2003, Robert Collins wrote: > >> On Sat, 2003-02-15 at 08:23, Christopher Faylor wrote: >> > > Or have >> > >web crawlers changed such that this doesn't work anymore? >> > >> > I'll try that. Thanks. >> >> I wouldn't: google actively lowers your page ranking when it sees such >> garbage. > >Where, exactly, did you read this (a link to some doc would be >enightening)? I see nothing about this in Googles documentation of Page >Ranking. And, google isn't the only search engine out there. I'd think >you'd want to try and get as much exposure as possible in as many engines >as possible. That was exactly my thinking. I knew that google didn't fall prey to the duplicated keyword scenario but I thought it would be useful for other search engines. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/