Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID: <00d001c2d530$02497430$78d96f83@pomello>
From: "Max Bowsher" <maxb AT ukf DOT net>
To: <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
References: <Pine DOT LNX DOT 4 DOT 44 DOT 0302151214040 DOT 9768-100000 AT www DOT eyesopen DOT com> <20030215201531 DOT GA28797 AT redhat DOT com>
Subject: Re: [Problem] mempcpy is missing?
Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2003 20:22:49 -0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106

bChristopher Faylor wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 15, 2003 at 12:35:56PM -0700, Roger Sayle wrote:
>> I apologise if this is the wrong list to report bugs.  I have
>> searched the archive and haven't been able to find a reference to
>> mempcpy.
>
> As you have discovered, mempcpy is not provided.  If a configure
> script detects it, the configure script is broken.

As he said, his configure script correctly decides #undef HAVE_MEMPCPY

But then the source tries to define its own replacement mempcpy - but it
can't, because that clashes with Cygwin's headers. So this really is
Cygwin's fault.



Max.


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/