Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2003 15:20:14 -0500 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Why the rash of people bypassing setup.exe to install? Message-ID: <20030215202014.GB28797@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <20030215195903 DOT GA28395 AT redhat DOT com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i On Sat, Feb 15, 2003 at 02:11:09PM -0600, Gary R. Van Sickle wrote: >>On Sat, Feb 15, 2003 at 01:21:46PM -0600, Gary R. Van Sickle wrote: >>>I think something's wildly wrong with the world when my handful of >>>crusty old pages end up as the #1 Cygwin hit on Google. ;-) I can >>>assure everybody that I've done nothing to try to make that the case. >> >>I think it's part of the world-wide Cygwin conspiracy. >> >>Btw, I notice that "cygwin installation" is even more annoying. The >>second hit brings you directly to a GPL violation, AFAICT. > >The ptolemy guy?: > >"The file we provide includes the following packages and their source >code" Oops. Nevermind. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/