Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Message-ID: <3E4DA65C.7020801@ece.gatech.edu> Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2003 21:30:52 -0500 From: Charles Wilson User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.2.1) Gecko/20021130 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Why the rash of people bypassing setup.exe to install? References: <20030214182615 DOT GA20996 AT redhat DOT com> <20030214193229 DOT GA23190 AT redhat DOT com> In-Reply-To: <20030214193229.GA23190@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Christopher Faylor wrote: > FWIW, I've recently sent email to Mumit Khan for similar reasons. His > "ancient" gnu-win32 site still shows up in google and some of the > outdated techniques espoused there demonstrably cause confusion. It's even worse that you think. Last week's LWN contained a newssnippet about "Xmingwin" -- a linux-build, mingw-target cross compiler leveraged off of Earnie's mingw. Which, of course, has a heritage from cygwin. If you read the article that lwn refers to, http://www-106.ibm.com/developerworks/linux/library/l-sc10.html you find that ITS "resources" section contains a ton of links to a lot of old, unmaintained, and otherwise inaccurate mingw and cygwin sites -- including two separate links to Mumit's pages. And this is a NEW, January 2003 article in IBM's developerWorks. Sigh. --Chuck -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/