Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2003 20:22:53 -0500 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Why the rash of people bypassing setup.exe to install? Message-ID: <20030215012253.GA23966@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <20030214222838 DOT GA14308 AT redhat DOT com> <20030215000815 DOT 45437 DOT qmail AT web21403 DOT mail DOT yahoo DOT com> <20030215003947 DOT GC17991 AT redhat DOT com> <040c01c2d48f$a643fac0$ab7886d9 AT webdev> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <040c01c2d48f$a643fac0$ab7886d9@webdev> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i On Sat, Feb 15, 2003 at 01:14:54AM -0000, Elfyn McBratney wrote: >> Actually, just creating a file named 'con' would probably be easier. > >Isn't 'con' a reserved name in windows? That's kinda the whole point. >I'm pretty sure you wouldn't be able to extract it from the tar >archive. It works just as I would expect, and just like /dev/tty works, which is no surprise. The drawback is that it won't do anything if you're running from rxvt or X-Windows, though. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/