Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Message-ID: <20030215000815.45437.qmail@web21403.mail.yahoo.com> Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2003 16:08:15 -0800 (PST) From: Rick Rankin Subject: Re: Why the rash of people bypassing setup.exe to install? To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com In-Reply-To: <20030214222838.GA14308@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii --- Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Fri, Feb 14, 2003 at 02:21:18PM -0800, Randall R Schulz wrote: > >Chris, > > > >At 13:59 2003-02-14, Christopher Faylor wrote: > >>On Sat, Feb 15, 2003 at 07:50:48AM +1100, andrew clarke wrote: > >>>On Fri, Feb 14, 2003 at 01:26:15PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote: > >>> > >>>> ... > >>> > >>>If I may, speaking on behalf of some of the less-technical Cygwin users, > >>>some points: > >>> > >>>Obviously for simple .tar.bz2 files without any dependencies or post- > >>>install scripts, etc, untarring would appear to users to be a harmless > >>>thing to do. > > > >Maybe a new naming convention might serve to deter the naive: > >PackageName-versionOrDateTag.car ("Cygwin ARchive"). It would still be > >a BZip2-compressed TAR file, just as Java's ".jar" files are PKZIP > >files under a different name (and with some extra content structuring > >conventions). > > You know, I almost mentioned that but I think that someone (Robert > Collins maybe?) may have suggested this previously and I adamantly > intoned that these were ".tar.bz2 files dammit". > > However, changing the extension would go some way towards alleviating > this problem and it would open the door to creating different package > formats, identifiable by magic number. > > I was also thinking of creating a '/dev/tty' file in the archive which > was just a real file containing the words "Hey! What are YOU DOING???" I > think that would cause a tar extraction to print that message to the > screen. Don't know what it would do to setup.exe, though. I think I'm confused. If you do this, then every time we run tar we'd see "Hey! What are YOU DOING???" unless we removed /dev/tty? If so, it seems to me like that would be annoying and it would be a pain to have remember to go remove /dev/tty after every time we run setup to *avoid* that message. --Rick -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/