Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Message-Id: <5.2.0.9.2.20030214104007.02ead0e8@pop3.cris.com> X-Sender: rrschulz AT pop3 DOT cris DOT com Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2003 10:43:40 -0800 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com From: Randall R Schulz Subject: Re: Why the rash of people bypassing setup.exe to install? In-Reply-To: References: <20030214182615 DOT GA20996 AT redhat DOT com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed At 10:34 2003-02-14, Igor Pechtchanski wrote: >On Fri, 14 Feb 2003, Christopher Faylor wrote: > > > ... > > > > Can anyone offer any explanation about this? Or maybe convince me that > > I'm wrong in noticing this trend? I suppose that it is possible that > > we are now hitting a newer stupider brand of user who just can't be > > bothered to read the cygwin web site and click on a link to download > > but I'm wondering if there is another explanation. Maybe there is > > a popular web page out there with wrong advice or something... > > > > cgf > >Well, guess what comes up first on a Google search for "cygwin install"? >See for yourself: (just in >case, the first match I get is >, >last updated on March 24, 2000). :-( >I don't know if there's anything that can be done about it, though... > Igor Wow. Classic Cygwin humor, number 1 on Google! Did you notice the copyright holder for these pages? I still think APHC's joke show is funnier. RRS -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/