Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2003 22:17:52 -0500 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Wget ignores robot.txt entry Message-ID: <20030214031752.GA3687@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <5 DOT 2 DOT 0 DOT 9 DOT 2 DOT 20030213182750 DOT 01e97e98 AT pop3 DOT cris DOT com> <5 DOT 2 DOT 0 DOT 9 DOT 2 DOT 20030213185143 DOT 01da0ef0 AT pop3 DOT cris DOT com> <034901c2d3d5$bf3e2150$78d96f83 AT pomello> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <034901c2d3d5$bf3e2150$78d96f83@pomello> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i On Fri, Feb 14, 2003 at 03:04:10AM -0000, Max Bowsher wrote: >Randall R Schulz wrote: >> Wget is orphaned? That's bad news, since it seems to have it all over >> cURL. (Sure. Go ahead and prove me wrong. I might as well get it over >> with... for now.) > >cURL doesn't do recursive web-suck (does it?) > >Yes, wget is orphaned. There's no one on the wget mailing list who has CVS >write access. Which is a great shame, as there are a surprising amount of >patches being sent in. Sounds like one of you should volunteer for this duty. :-) cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/