Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2003 20:03:35 +0100
From: Daniel Steinmann <daniel DOT steinmann AT insonic DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: Bug in path.cc (conv_path_list_buf_size)
Message-ID: <20030206190335.GA984@stonie.insonic.com>
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i


On Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 04:39:53PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 04, 2003 at 04:02:37PM -0500, Christopher Faylor
> wrote:
> >On Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 05:40:21PM +0100, Daniel Steinmann wrote:
> >>The above mentioned function returns sometimes a too small buffer
> >>size. This problem was found when using 'cygpath --path --windows'
> >>
> >>I see following solutions:
> >>
> >>a) Increase the slop.
> >>
> >>b) Make the size estimation more precise by adding the size of
> >>   the current working directory for each relativ path element.
> >>
> >>What do you think?
> >
> >I'll add something which should suffice to work around the
> >problem for
> >1.3.20.
>
> There is a new snapshot up with the change, if you want to try it.

It works!

Thanks a lot,
Daniel

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/