Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2003 22:25:22 -0500 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: [avail for test] libtool-devel-20030121-1 Message-ID: <20030204032522.GB5265@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <3E3D8B4C DOT 1040703 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <004d01c2cbbf$3da7bbb0$0a1c440a AT BRAMSCHE> <3E3F2DC1 DOT 8000105 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3E3F2DC1.8000105@ece.gatech.edu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i On Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 10:04:33PM -0500, Charles Wilson wrote: >But, in any case, *even if it worked in all cases*, it's too late. At >this point, this IS the mechanism that libtool will use; it's been >through the wringer with the folks on the automake list, libtool list, >and has been tested on cygwin and mingw. The symlink idea has not >(plus, there's my earlier experience in which the symlink idea failed >somehow). I don't suppose that the idea was squashed because symlinks don't work for mingw. Although I guess they do work courtesy of cygw, er, msys. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/