Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2003 13:26:06 -0500 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: document heap_chunk_in_mb? Message-ID: <20030203182606.GA14353@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i Any volunteers to document heap_chunk_in_mb? It's conspicuously missing in the documentation, AFAICT. Although, hmm, I haven't seen many complaints about this recently. That's odd. Maybe the overflow code in the new malloc is actually working. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/