Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2003 17:16:33 +0100 From: Corinna Vinschen To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: socketpair(AF_UNIX, SOCK_STREAM, 0, fd) failing: errno 112, Address already in use Message-ID: <20030203161633.GE21956@cygbert.vinschen.de> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <00de01c2c701$ac90f130$78d96f83 AT pomello> <20030203160004 DOT GC21956 AT cygbert DOT vinschen DOT de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030203160004.GC21956@cygbert.vinschen.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i On Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 05:00:04PM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > On Tue, Jan 28, 2003 at 07:15:52PM -0000, Max Bowsher wrote: > > I'm seeing rsync failiures due to socketpair(AF_UNIX, SOCK_STREAM, 0, fd) > > failing with errno 112, Address already in use. > > > > As far as I know, this shouldn't be able to occur. This seems to me like a > > Cygwin bug? If it is, then this is a bug report. > > Would you mind to create a test case? Or, on second thought, first try running rsync under strace. socketpair() gives some important hints in which part of the implementation the error occurs. The debug output of the failing socketpair() call would be interesting to see... Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Developer mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat, Inc. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/