Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Message-ID: <00f801c2cb03$7e1040d0$78d96f83@pomello> From: "Max Bowsher" To: , "Randall R Schulz" References: <5 DOT 2 DOT 0 DOT 9 DOT 0 DOT 20030202154555 DOT 02e2eed8 AT junk> <008701c2cafe$7ccc4160$c2e686d9 AT webdev> <5 DOT 2 DOT 0 DOT 9 DOT 2 DOT 20030202132551 DOT 029c3f58 AT pop3 DOT cris DOT com> Subject: Re: Setup 2.249.2.5, Package 'grep' 2.5-1, missing 'egrep.exe' and 'fgrep.exe' Date: Sun, 2 Feb 2003 21:38:57 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Randall R Schulz wrote: > Max, > > At 13:12 2003-02-02, Max Bowsher wrote: >> Elfyn McBratney wrote: >>>> Perhaps ... but I'm not running under bash and never have. Did I >>>> miss a documented restriction that the programs *only* run under >>>> bash? >>> >>> It depends on the package. With something like grep you cannot (?) >>> call a egrep from cmd.exe/command.com per se as it is a symbolic >>> link to grep.exe (a windows shortcut) but you could call it from >>> bash >> >> Ah, but since it is created by setup, it is a system-cookie type >> symlink, not a windows-shortcut type symlink. > > On my system both egrep and fgrep are old-style Cygwin-only symlinks. > But some of the symlinks in my Cygwin bin directory are the new > Windows shortcut-based symlinks. > > Perhaps this mixture occurs for me because my Cygwin installation > predates the debut of the Windows-shortcut-based symlinks. Or could it > be because some of the symlinks are created by post-install scripts > and are new-style and others are created by the tar code embedded in > the Cygwin Setup.exe installer and are the old kind? The 2nd. >>>> bash -c /bin/egrep >>> >>> within your batch scripts. >> >> What about grep -E ? (Which is preferred anyway for maximum >> portability.) > > (Oh?) IIRC, POSIX dropped the requirement for egrep and fgrep. Libtool has been converting egrep -> "grep -E" and fgrep -> "grep -F". Max. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/