Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2003 23:09:41 -0500 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: /usr/bin/tclsh84 Message-ID: <20030201040941.GA20785@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <3E3B3B6B DOT 8020308 AT eCosCentric DOT com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3E3B3B6B.8020308@eCosCentric.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i On Sat, Feb 01, 2003 at 03:13:47AM +0000, Jonathan Larmour wrote: >Ah another day another tclsh. Ah, another hour, another tcl/tk whinge. >Even if it's only a soft link to the most recently installed tclshNN >(like RPM post-install scripts do for the linux kernel etc.). I know >cygwin has got post-install scripts, so any reason not to? I don't know what post-install scripts have to do with anything but I'll add symbolic links to everything in the cygwin tcl release if it stops just one of these tcl/tk complaints. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/